Team-based care of the thoracic surgical patient.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although team-based care has been shown in many sectors to improve outcomes, very little work has been done with the thoracic surgical patient. This review article focuses on this and, extrapolating from other closely related surgical fields, teamwork in thoracic surgery will be reviewed for outcome efficacy and substance. RECENT FINDINGS: The optimal team has been shown to display behaviors that allow them to model future needs, predict disaster, be adaptable to change, and promote team cohesiveness all with a positive effect on perioperative outcome. The suboptimal team will have transactional leadership, poor communication, ineffective conflict resolution, and hold rigid beliefs about other team members. SUMMARY: To improve outcome, the thoracic surgical team, centered on the anesthesiologist and surgeon, will display the 'Big 5' attributes of highly effective teams. There are attributes of poor teams, which the dyad should avoid in order to increase the team's function and thus outcome.

The Vascular System: Anatomical, Physiological, Pathological, and Aging Considerations.

The vascular system is one of the earliest recognized anatomical systems. It is composed of 3 parts; arterial, capillary, and venous, each with their own unique anatomy and physiology. Blood flow through this system is compromised in aging, atherosclerosis and peripheral vascular disease, and the practicing anesthesiologist must understand both the physiology and pathophysiology of the vascular tree.

Preoperative Liver Stiffness is Associated With Hospital Length of Stay After Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Risk assessment models for cardiac surgery do not account for the degrees of liver dysfunction. Ultrasound shear-wave elastography measures liver stiffness (LSM), a quantitative measurement related to fibrosis, congestion, and inflammation. The authors hypothesized that preoperative liver stiffness would be associated with hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University hospital, single center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred five adult patients undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative liver stiffness measured by ultrasound elastography. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The associations were analyzed using linear mixed models, with adjustments for preoperative variables, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, and type of surgery. Median liver stiffness was 6.4 kPa (range, 4.1-18.6 kPa). The median length of hospital stay was 6 days (range, 3-18 d). Each unit increase in liver stiffness, treated as a continuous variable, was associated with an increase of 0.32 ± 0.10 days in the hospital (p = 0.002). When treated as a categorical variable (<6 kPa, 6-9.4 kPa, and ≥9.5 kPa), LSM ≥9.5 kPa v LSM <6 kPa was associated strongly with an increase in hospital length of stay of 3.25 ± 0.87 days (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative LSM ≥9.5 kPa was associated with a significantly longer postoperative hospital length of stay. This association appeared independent of preoperative comorbidities commonly associated with coronary disease. Preoperative liver stiffness is a novel risk metric that is associated with the postoperative hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery.

Simple budget-neutral tool to improve intraoperative communication.

BACKGROUND: Communication failure is a common cause of medical errors and adverse events. Within the operating room (OR), there are many barriers to good communication, which can adversely affect patient outcome. OBJECTIVE: Implementing a simple, cost-neutral tool aimed at improving intraoperative communication and engagement. METHODS: Three anaesthesiology residents collected data using a data sheet and tailored surveys distributed to OR staff. Data were collected over a 2-week period in 2019, with 1 week each of preintervention and postintervention data collection. The intervention consisted of wearing OR caps displaying the first name and role of the anaesthesia resident clearly on the front. RESULTS: A total of 20 data sheets and 48 preintervention and postintervention surveys were collected for a response rate of 57%. There was a statistically significant increase in OR staff knowledge of the anaesthesia resident's name (66% vs 100%, p=<0.001), an increase in the mean number of times the surgical providers addressed the anaesthesia residents (3.6 vs 7.8, p=0.0074) and an increase in the mean number of times the surgical providers addressed them by their first name (0.7 vs 4, p=0.0067). Comments received during the intervention were positive with overwhelming support. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a simple, cost-effective intervention can result in dramatic improvement in intraoperative communication and engagement between teams.